|

©
THE NEW YORK TIMES
May
8, 1993
Kurt
Vonnegut's Reinterpretation of ''L' Histoire du Soldat''
By
ALLAN KOZINN
The drawing card on the New York Philomusica Chamber
Ensemble program on Thursday evening at Alice Tully
Hall was Stravinsky's ''Histoire
du Soldat,'' with a new text composed for the occasion
by Kurt Vonnegut Jr.
Because the text and music in a music-drama work are
so closely intertwined, replacing a work's text is no
small thing. In this case the gestures, language and
spirit of Stravinsky's music mirror the Soldier's progress
and describe the odd, supernatural circumstances in
the original text by Charles Ferdinand Ramuz. For anyone
who knows and loves the work, both elements make crucial
points. Mr. Vonnegut has not merely updated or tinkered
with the Ramuz text, but has jettisoned it entirely,
offering as justification his belief that it did not
adequately reflect the state of the world when the work
was composed, toward the end of World War I.
"What
the people have to say in between Stravinsky's brilliant
little outbursts up to now has less than nothing to
do with the gruesome and humiliating life of any soldier
in any war in any time," Mr. Vonnegut wrote in
his notes. "I cannot understand how Stravinsky,
in exile from his native Russia but of military age
when he wrote the music, could have found acceptable
words which were so unresponsive to a war then going
on in which 65 million persons had been mobilized and
35 million were becoming casualties."
Mr. Vonnegut is not the first to mention this incongruity,
but Stravinsky's use of the Ramuz text is really not
so difficult to understand. Stravinsky did not believe,
as Mr. Vonnegut apparently does, that any work written
in wartime and involving a soldier must be about the
horrors of combat. The Ramuz text, based on Russian
folk tales, is not about war at all, nor about the soldierly
side of soldiering, nor even about the real world. It
is a somewhat more mystical morality tale about the
Devil's snares and about human failings of a nonbellicose
nature.
Surely Mr. Vonnegut is toying with us: one does not
become as esteemed a novelist as he is without recognizing
such basic universal archetypes and the fact that their
applicability transcends historical circumstances. But
Mr. Vonnegut has his own agenda, and invited to present
his vision of what ''Histoire du Soldat'' should have
been, he transformed the magical tale of the Soldier
and the Devil into the tale of a World War II deserter
who is imprisoned and executed, basing it loosely on
the story of Eddie Slovik, the only American soldier
executed (in 1945, for desertion) since the Civil War.
In place of Ramuz's naive, easily misled Soldier on
leave, Mr. Vonnegut offers a wisecracking deserter who
is confronted by a General, rather than the Devil. The
other characters -- a Military Policeman and a Red Cross
Girl -- are of little account. He has a trial, he is
visited briefly in the stockade by the Red Cross Girl,
he is shot, and that's about all there is to it, apart
from an unadorned synopsis of the Slovik story, offered
as a coda. The rhymed text is full of bad puns and descriptions
of battle scenes so cliched as to be impotent.
Stravinsky's music, in this version, is treated as unrelated
and not terribly consequential background music. It
did, however, get a crisp, precise reading from the
Philomusica players, and it was difficult not to imagine
the ghosts of Stravinsky and Ramuz hovering over the
ensemble and glowering at the proceedings.
The piece was economically directed and staged by Pat
Burke, who used four triangular modules turned different
ways to suggest the headquarters, prison and execution
yard. Eli Wallach as the General, Martin Vidnovic as
the Military Policeman and Ann Reinking as the Red Cross
Girl delivered their lines without much passion, and
often seemed to be giving their first reading of the
script. Jim Bracchita's soldier, though crudely overplayed,
was at least livelier.
The rest of the program -- a crystalline account of
Mozart's Piano Concerto No. 9 (K. 271), with Robert
Levin's feisty rendering of the solo line, and Henri
Dutilleux's spiky ''Citations'' (1991) -- showed off
the considerable polish of the freelance players who
make up the Philomusica group.
© THE NEW YORK TIMES
|
 |